Art gallery caffè




Add link to our catalogue
Add link to our catalogue

Main » Web design and development » The current standard page size is 800x600 pixels. Some sites even explicitly state this with the disclaimer "this site best viewed at 800x600." If part of a page falls outside the viewable browsing area, scroll bars appear. Surfing the Web with a smaller screen resolution, for instance at 640x480, reduces the user experience to a frustrating scrolling exercise. (Generally, horizontal scrolling is much worse than vertical.) Most computers allow users to set the resolution of their choice for a reason. For some types of work it's more efficient to use a high screen resolution, which optimizes desktop workspace. Other people need to work at lower resolutions, which enlarges the display. This choice is independent of the actual size of the monitor hardware: Someone with a 21" monitor can have a display resolution of 640x480. The reason why 800x600 has been adopted as the standard Web page size is clear: Average screen resolutions of Web surfers can easily be obtained. Here are the latest statistics worldwide:
The current standard page size is 800x600 pixels. Some sites even explicitly state this with the disclaimer "this site best viewed at 800x600." If part of a page falls outside the viewable browsing area, scroll bars appear. Surfing the Web with a smaller screen resolution, for instance at 640x480, reduces the user experience to a frustrating scrolling exercise. (Generally, horizontal scrolling is much worse than vertical.) Most computers allow users to set the resolution of their choice for a reason. For some types of work it's more efficient to use a high screen resolution, which optimizes desktop workspace. Other people need to work at lower resolutions, which enlarges the display. This choice is independent of the actual size of the monitor hardware: Someone with a 21" monitor can have a display resolution of 640x480. The reason why 800x600 has been adopted as the standard Web page size is clear: Average screen resolutions of Web surfers can easily be obtained. Here are the latest statistics worldwide: http://www.simple-ways.net/

Design and Printing Articles

UNDEVELOPED IDEAS -- Especially in older issues, you will find really good ideas that were, for one reason or another, never developed. Perhaps the originator lost interest or didn't have the capital to develop his idea. He may have died or he may have run off with a chorus girl from Las Vegas and forgotten all about the mail order business. If you can develop the idea, you have a mail order product. WHOLESALE SOURCES -- Watch for ads that say "Dealers Wanted" (in more current issues, of course). Here may be the perfect source of mailorder products for you. STUDY THE ARTICLES -- They will show you what the readers are interested in and they will give you clues as to what the readers want to buy. Remember the articles are doing two things -- they are Printing Articles about subjects which the readers are already interested. But they are also CREATING NEW INTERESTS in the minds of the readers. CAN YOU CREATE A PRODUCT THAT READERS WILL WANT AS A RESULT OF READING THOSE ARTICLES?

I found the part where Archaeology Magazine was Printing Articles saying the Sphinx and Pyramids were mere imitations of natural landforms a little bizarre. But that poured in place theory of Davidovits which you support doesn't explain the 'fit' of the sarcophagus or the obelisks found in their quarries. I support that as just one of the technologies they used and you are right it cannot explain a 1/150th inch tolerance in the lidless sarcophagus that never had any human remains in it. In fact no Giza Pyramid had any funerary purpose and no remains of humans have been found in them. The American Research Center in Egypt did use AMS accelerators to date biologics found inside the Pyramid in some places. These biologics like straw showed the Great Pyramid is 450 years older than the Step Pyramid which Egyptology says was built before the Great Pyramid. Ok, I guess we can't cover all the other possible technologies that you and the likes of Christopher Dunn have shown could have been used. You really do have a passionate stance on the matter of Hawass and the likes of Cayce the Masonic agent and his Foundation which paid to educate Hawass and Lehner though.

I surely do have issues with liars and the Bible Narrative which ultimately justifies Manifest Destiny and blames G-d or attributes things to aliens when man is responsible for all these things. National Geographic and other Egyptologists outside that cabal have provided me with lots of good reading and I share these perspectives with my readers. But you carry on about Kelts and Phoenicians to the point that it is almost impossible to imagine they really were all over the earth with the Red-headed League of Megalith Builders making the hundreds of Pyramids. And some of the uses of the Earth Energy Grid they are built to enhance which are located or aligned with; are really TOO fantastic to accept for someone who has not studied all the sources you quote.

Added: 01.08.2007 Hits: 4910

Add link to our catalogue
Add link to our catalogue

Web 2.0 Online Dating Service with Dating Games: www.FirstClickFriend.com
Art gallery caffè Articles catalogue